NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and AMD Radeon R9 380X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 970 MHz
  • 961.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
  • Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9321 vs 6187
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 vs 666
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 9685
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 9685
  • Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 3053
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 June 2019 vs 19 November 2015
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 970 MHz
Texture fill rate 119.4 GTexel/s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9321 vs 6187
PassMark - G2D Mark 906 vs 666
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11437 vs 9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11437 vs 9685
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3404 vs 3053

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X

  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1676
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1676
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2048 vs 1280
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9321
6187
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
906
666
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11437
9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1676
3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11437
9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1676
3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3404
3053
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2200 AMD Radeon R9 380X
PassMark - G3D Mark 9321 6187
PassMark - G2D Mark 906 666
Geekbench - OpenCL 32445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11437 9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1676 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11437 9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1676 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3404 3053

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2200 AMD Radeon R9 380X

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 3.0
Code name GP106 Antigua
Launch date 10 June 2019 19 November 2015
Place in performance rating 318 320
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $229
Price now $528.44
Value for money (0-100) 15.61

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz 970 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 119.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 59.72 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.822 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1280 2048
Pixel fill rate 59.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 119.4 GTexel/s 124.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 190 Watt
Transistor count 4400 million 5,000 million
Compute units 32
Floating-point performance 3,973 gflops
Stream Processors 2048

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 201 mm (7.9") 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors None ​2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length

API support

DirectX 12.0 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 200.2 GB/s 182.4 GB/s
Memory bus width 160 bit 64 bit
Memory type GDDR5X GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory clock speed 970 MHz

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore