AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs AMD FireStream 9370
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 and AMD FireStream 9370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 32.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.0 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 1600
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,120 gflops vs 2,640.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Launch date | 3 September 2015 vs 23 June 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 1600 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops vs 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9370
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 580 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9370
Name | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | AMD FireStream 9370 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | AMD FireStream 9370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Grenada | Cypress |
Launch date | 3 September 2015 | 23 June 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 246 | 129 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 580 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |