AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 9.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 384
- 8.1x better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9556 vs 2360
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 479
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9556 vs 2360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 479 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9556 | 2360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.671 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Fury | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Fiji | GF104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 10 July 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Place in performance rating | 266 | 264 |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 384 |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 1,950 million |
Core clock speed | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |