NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 1247.3x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 10116
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 10116
  • Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 4739
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2018 vs 10 July 2015
Boost clock speed 1569 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 vs 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 vs 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 vs 4739

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

  • Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
  • Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53058 vs 39352
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 3584 vs 2560
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 53058 vs 39352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39352
53058
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
6252
4739
Name NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Geekbench - OpenCL 39352 53058
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 4739
PassMark - G3D Mark 9555
PassMark - G2D Mark 789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 141.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3600.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 133.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 791.572

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 3.0
Code name GP104 Fiji
Launch date 21 February 2018 10 July 2015
Place in performance rating 268 265
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch price (MSRP) $549
Price now $399.99
Value for money (0-100) 35.98

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1569 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 1316 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 279.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 139.7 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.940 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 3584
Pixel fill rate 111.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s 224.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 7200 million 8,900 million
Compute units 56
Floating-point performance 7,168 gflops
Stream Processors 3584

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size Large
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors ​2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 230.4 GB/s 512 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 4096 bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) 500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)