NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1247.3x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 10116
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 10116
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 4739
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 vs 4739 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53058 vs 39352
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53058 vs 39352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39352 | 53058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 | 4739 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9555 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.671 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Fiji |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 10 July 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 268 | 265 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | Large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |