NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 M280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4020 vs 814
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 285 vs 247
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 5 February 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4020 vs 814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 vs 247 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41708 vs 12601
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1341
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 999 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 1,700 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 vs 12601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4020 | 814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 | 41708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Saturn |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 5 February 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 656 | 658 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 88 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX350
