AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs ATI FireMV 2200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M280X and ATI FireMV 2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 43.2x more texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 22.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 814 vs 36
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 February 2015 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 324 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 814 vs 36 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 247
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | ATI FireMV 2200 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 259 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 814 | 36 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M280X | ATI FireMV 2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Saturn | RV370 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 5 February 2015 | 1 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 656 | 659 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 324 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 107 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 9.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 3.136 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 392 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |