AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X and NVIDIA GeForce 720A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 15.01 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 96
- 8.2x better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 360.2 gflops
- 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5150 vs 614
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2014 vs 1 July 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 15.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 360.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 vs 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 720A
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 938 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 7.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 938 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 720A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | NVIDIA GeForce 720A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26884 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X | NVIDIA GeForce 720A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Amethyst | GF117 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 23 November 2014 | 1 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 498 | 499 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 938 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 360.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 15.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | Not Listed | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |