AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs ATI Radeon X850 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X and ATI Radeon X850 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 520 MHz
- 11.1x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 8.32 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 63.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5150 vs 81
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2014 vs 1 December 2004 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz vs 520 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 8.32 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 326 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X850 XT
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X850 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | ATI Radeon X850 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X | ATI Radeon X850 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | R400 |
Code name | Amethyst | R480 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 23 November 2014 | 1 December 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 499 | 495 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 520 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 8.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | Not Listed | 9.0b |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 34.6 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1080 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |