AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs AMD Radeon HD 7970

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X and AMD Radeon HD 7970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date 23 November 2014 vs 22 December 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 300 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970

  • Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
  • Around 28% better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 vs 27035
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 vs 65.777
  • Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 vs 820.138
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 vs 7.142
  • Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 vs 68.754
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 vs 386.418
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2045
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3144
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2045
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3144
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 118.4 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 3,789 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 34541 vs 27035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 84.413 vs 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1390.592 vs 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.336 vs 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 101.929 vs 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 481.76 vs 386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3704 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3704 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 3144

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
27035
34541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.777
84.413
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
820.138
1390.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.142
7.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
68.754
101.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
386.418
481.76
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2045
3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3144
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2045
3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3144
3350
Name AMD Radeon R9 M295X AMD Radeon HD 7970
PassMark - G3D Mark 5150
PassMark - G2D Mark 832
Geekbench - OpenCL 27035 34541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.777 84.413
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 820.138 1390.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.142 7.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 68.754 101.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 386.418 481.76
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2045 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3144 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2045 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3144 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9448
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9448
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2276

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M295X AMD Radeon HD 7970

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Amethyst Tahiti
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series
Launch date 23 November 2014 22 December 2011
Place in performance rating 497 499
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $549

Technical info

Core clock speed 723 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops 3,789 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 2048
Texture fill rate 92.54 GTexel / s 118.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 5,000 million 4,313 million
Boost clock speed 925 MHz
Stream Processors 2048

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCIe 2.1 x16
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 274 mm

API support

DirectX Not Listed 11
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 264 GB/s
Memory type Not Listed GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire