AMD Radeon R9 M380 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 601 MHz
- Environ 33% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1,154 gflops
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 versus 1947
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 versus 300
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12565 versus 5986
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 versus 10.054
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 1.46
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 22.103
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 36.553
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 1 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 601 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 1,154 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 versus 1947 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 versus 300 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 versus 5986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 versus 10.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 versus 544.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 versus 1.46 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 versus 22.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 36.553 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 768
- Environ 87% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 versus 3688
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 versus 536
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 versus 2855
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 versus 3688
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 versus 536
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 versus 2855
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.08 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 768 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3855 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 versus 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3855 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 versus 2855 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 | 1947 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 300 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 | 5986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 10.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 544.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 1.46 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 22.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 36.553 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 3855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 4957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 4470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 3855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 4957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 4470 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Strato | GK104 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 863 | 860 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 601 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 48.08 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M380 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
