AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, API support, Memory, Technologies, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 vs 10216
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 30.848
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 438.581
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 2.268
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 46.988
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 139.235
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 3241
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 3241
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 vs 10216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 46.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 139.235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1232
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1232
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 09 June 2015 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 1232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 10216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 46.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 139.235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Lexa |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 | 12 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 830 | 804 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Type | Workstation | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |