AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 versus 10229
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 30.848
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 438.581
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 2.268
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 46.988
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 139.235
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 3241
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 3241
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 versus 10229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 46.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 139.235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 1232
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 1232
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 June 2017 versus 09 June 2015 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 1232 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 10229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 46.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 139.235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | Lexa |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 12 June 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 831 | 804 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 56 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1219 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,248 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |