AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395X and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5195 vs 4893
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 612
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.367 vs 63.455
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 413.329 vs 315.366
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 2,688 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5195 vs 4893 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 vs 612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 vs 63.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 vs 315.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.545 vs 799.421
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.339 vs 5.718
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 71.057
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 7365
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2154
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 7365
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2154
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 vs 799.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.339 vs 5.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 vs 71.057 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 vs 7365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 2154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 vs 7365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 2154 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M395X | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5195 | 4893 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 | 612 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 | 63.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.421 | 1314.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 | 6.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 | 315.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7365 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2154 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7365 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2154 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1771 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Amethyst | Curacao |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 461 | 439 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $399 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Eyefinity | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |