AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro RG220
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and ATI FirePro RG220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 64x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 51.2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 80
- 102.4x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 1 May 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro RG220
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: ATI FirePro RG220
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | ATI FirePro RG220 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4579 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 552 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 335 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | ATI FirePro RG220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Fiji | RV711 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 1 May 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 261 | 262 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 80 |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 242 million |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |