NVIDIA T400 4GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and AMD Radeon R9 Nano videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 133.6x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 256.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 27 August 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 256.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- 10.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 384
Pipelines | 4096 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3798 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17250 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Fiji |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 27 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 262 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 256.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 152 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |