AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 7x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 10.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 384
- 9.3x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4579 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2360 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Fiji | GF104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 263 | 265 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 1,950 million |
Core clock speed | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |