AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 902 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 vs 30.133
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 64.264
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 vs 148.747
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 10 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 vs 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 vs 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 vs 148.747 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
- 1889.1x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 970.421
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 4.656
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 6821
- 79.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 115.4
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 vs 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 4.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 vs 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 vs 115.4 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4101 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 9209 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Baffin | GK110B |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 10 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 540 | 538 |
| Price now | $179.50 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | 4,156 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon X1950 PRO
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M GE
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDFirePro M6000
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
