AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 versus 30.133
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 64.264
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 148.747
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 10 September 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 versus 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 148.747 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 173.2 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2.6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 896
- 1889.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 versus 970.421
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 4.656
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 versus 6821
- 79.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 versus 115.4
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 173.2 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 versus 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 4.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 versus 115.4 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4101 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 9209 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK110B |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 10 September 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 540 | 538 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 4,156 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon X1950 PRO
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M GE
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDFirePro M6000
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
