AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs AMD FirePro M6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

AMD FirePro M6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 800 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4101 vs 1820
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17592 vs 8095
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6821 vs 3024

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 August 2016 vs 1 July 2012
Core clock speed	1090 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate	67.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Pipelines	896 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4101 vs 1820
Geekbench - OpenCL	17592 vs 8095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6821 vs 3024

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000

465.5x better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 70 Watt
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 578
26.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3024 vs 115.4

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	43 Watt vs 70 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	776 vs 578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3024 vs 115.4

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4101

1820

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

578

776

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17592

8095

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6821

3024

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.4

3024

Name	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)	AMD FirePro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	4101	1820
PassMark - G2D Mark	578	776
Geekbench - OpenCL	17592	8095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	970.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	76.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	237.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6821	3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	115.4	3024
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3357

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)	AMD FirePro M6000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Baffin	Heathrow
Design	Radeon RX 400 Series
GCN generation	4th Gen
Launch date	8 August 2016	1 July 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$86
Place in performance rating	540	543
Price now	$179.50
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	33.86
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Compute units	14
Core clock speed	1090 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	2.2 TFLOPs	1,024 gflops
GPU Power	35-48 Watt
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	896	640
Stream Processors	896
Texture fill rate	67.2 GTexel / s	32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	70 Watt	43 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	170 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	400 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		n / a
Form factor		MXM-B
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore