AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1206 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.9x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7977 vs 1482
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 446
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7977 vs 1482 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 446 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M365X
- 241.6x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36410 vs 33737
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36410 vs 33737 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M365X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 M365X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7977 | 1482 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 446 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33737 | 36410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 M365X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Tropo |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 395 | 386 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 925 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 10 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 1,184 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core |