AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 10.7x more texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 vs 830
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 253
- 11.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33787 vs 2902
- 10.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 10.872
- 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 166.832
- 11.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 0.817
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 12.415
- 13.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 36.916
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 1951
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 vs 1693
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 1951
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 vs 1693
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 842 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 18 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 vs 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 vs 327 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 141.4x better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1674
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Ellesmere | GF108 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 18 June 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $59.99 |
Place in performance rating | 389 | 1311 |
Price now | $109.99 | $54.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | 20.48 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 692.7 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |