AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 226 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 18 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 226 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 137.5 GTexel / s
- 156.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 384.0 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4196 vs 1674
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4196 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 137.5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2x 384.0 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4196 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4196 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 4196 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Ellesmere | G92 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 18 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 488 | 490 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2x 384.0 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 128 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 226 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 2x 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |