NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 926 MHz
Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1206 MHz
436.3x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2443
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1674
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2443
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1674

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 October 2016 vs 4 August 2016
Core clock speed	1392 MHz vs 926 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1206 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687 vs 2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336 vs 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687 vs 2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336 vs 1674

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)

2.1x more texture fill rate: 137.5 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
942.9x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33787 vs 20732
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 75.758
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 843.503
Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 5.071
4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 24.676
Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 301.168
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 8496
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 8496
2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 842 vs 305

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	137.5 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 768
Memory clock speed	6600 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	33787 vs 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	111.543 vs 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1817.005 vs 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.511 vs 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	99.875 vs 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	511.362 vs 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9983 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9983 vs 8496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	842 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

20732

33787

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

75.758

111.543

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

843.503

1817.005

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.071

9.511

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.676

99.875

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

301.168

511.362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8496

9983

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

2443

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

1674

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8496

9983

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

2443

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

1674

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

305

842

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	650
Geekbench - OpenCL	20732	33787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758	111.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503	1817.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071	9.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676	99.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168	511.362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496	9983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687	2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336	1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496	9983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687	2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336	1674
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	305	842

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Code name	GP107	Ellesmere
Launch date	25 October 2016	4 August 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$549.99
Place in performance rating	487	488
Price now	$159.99	$109.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	46.07	91.95
Design		Radeon RX 400 Series
GCN generation		4th Gen
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	1206 MHz
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	926 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	4.9 TFLOPs
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C
Pipelines	768	2048
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s	137.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	5,700 million
Compute units		32
GPU Power		85-110 Watt
Stream Processors		2048
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
G-SYNC support
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bridgeless CrossFire
Laptop size		large
Recommended system power (PSU)		450 Watt
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL		2.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s	211 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	6600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
CrossFire
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 2.0b
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore