AMD Radeon RX 480 vs AMD Radeon HD 6650A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 480 and AMD Radeon HD 6650A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 12.7x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2304 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 10.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 836
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2016 vs 19 April 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 vs 836 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 418 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6650A
- 99.3x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 150 Watt
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6650A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon HD 6650A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 836 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4165 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon HD 6650A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Onega |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 29 June 2016 | 19 April 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 354 | 351 |
Price now | $299.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.8 TFLOPs | 576.0 gflops |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | n / a | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |