AMD Radeon RX 480 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 480 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2304 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 11.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 vs 724
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 247
- 20.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 vs 1905
- 21.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 vs 4.861
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 769.541 vs 235.463
- 16.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 vs 0.463
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 vs 15.918
- 15.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 vs 38.551
- 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 vs 1564
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3260
- 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 vs 1564
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2016 vs 19 April 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 vs 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 vs 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 vs 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 vs 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 vs 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 vs 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 vs 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670
- 132.4x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 150 Watt
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 | 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 | 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Turks |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 29 June 2016 | 19 April 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $99 |
Place in performance rating | 360 | 1255 |
Price now | $299.99 | $102.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | 13.12 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | 800 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5.8 TFLOPs | 768.0 gflops |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | n / a | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 168 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |