NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1120 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- 626.4x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 968
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1120 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 vs 968 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8590 vs 7222
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 437
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39553 vs 38863
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3698
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3698
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8590 vs 7222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 437 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39553 vs 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7222 | 8590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 775 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 39553 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 364 | 362 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $299.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 5.8 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | n / a | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |