NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1120 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- 626.4x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 966
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 June 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1120 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 vs 966 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 vs 7235
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 430
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 vs 38863
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3698
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3698
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 vs 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 vs 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7235 | 8578 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 774 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 39538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 362 | 360 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $299.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1120 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5.8 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580X
