NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 480

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and AMD Radeon RX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1120 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 182.3 GTexel / s
• Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
• 1892.1x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 7000 MHz
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67348 vs 39538
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 103.851
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 769.541
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 7.593
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 597.772
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2243 vs 966

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 vs 21.354
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 vs 10841
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3696
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3333
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 vs 10841
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3696
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	67348 39538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.792 103.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2368.267 769.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.829 7.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.354 67.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	992.132 597.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2243 966

Compare specifications (specs)