AMD Radeon RX 480 versus AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 480 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 480
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- 11.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 versus 724
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 versus 247
- 20.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 versus 1905
- 21.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 4.861
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 769.541 versus 235.463
- 16.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 0.463
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 15.918
- 15.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 38.551
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 1564
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3260
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 1564
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3260
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 versus 19 April 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 480 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 versus 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 versus 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 versus 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 versus 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 versus 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 versus 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 versus 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- 132.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.0 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 66 Watt versus 150 Watt
Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 | 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 | 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | Turks |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 | 19 April 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 360 | 1255 |
Prix maintenant | $299.99 | $102.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | 13.12 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz | 800 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | 768.0 gflops |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 66 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | n / a | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 168 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |