AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 823.8x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6600 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36495 vs 33812
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2443
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 4 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 926 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 vs 33812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 9813
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 9813
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 372
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7996 vs 4494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 9813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 9813 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 372 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7996 vs 4494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 9983 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | 33812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | 725 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4494 | 7996 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 387 | 385 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5300M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIRadeon X1800 GTO²
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon R9 380
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q
