AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 970 MHz
- 1171.3x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 14.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 7635
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 7635
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 7635 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 36495
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 372
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6120 vs 4494
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 36495 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 vs 372 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6120 vs 4494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 7635 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | 76397 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | 654 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4494 | 6120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2793 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Antigua |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 387 | 386 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $264.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 970 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 970 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |