AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 460
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 907 MHz
- 672x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2296 vs 1842
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2296 vs 1842
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 30 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 907 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 vs 1842 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 1548.3x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 356
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 1876
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15336 vs 9416
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 vs 356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 vs 1876 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15336 vs 9416 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 356 | 679 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1876 | 3453 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 | 15336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 | 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 | 1842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 594.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Baffin |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 30 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 636 | 637 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,858 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 81.28 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM with others
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla M10
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro 460
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
