AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 2156.7x better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3847 vs 1876
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 356
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19368 vs 9416
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3847 vs 1876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19368 vs 9416 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 482.3x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2296 vs 2070
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2296 vs 2070
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 vs 2070 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3847 | 1876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19368 | 9416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 635 | 636 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | 39.01 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compute units | 8 | |
Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |