AMD Radeon RX 550 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.8x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 7.6x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 630
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 314
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 3210
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 8.844
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 171.17
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.115
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 10.385
• 11.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 12.361
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 988
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 988

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1183 MHz
• 41.7x better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 940
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2158
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 940
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2158
• Around 53% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 194

Compare specifications (specs)