AMD Radeon RX 550 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 25.6x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 20
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 4.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 630
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 314
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 3210
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 8.844
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 171.17
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 1.115
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 10.385
- 11.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 12.361
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 988
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 988
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 20 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 988 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1183 MHz
- 41.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 50 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 940
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 2158
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 940
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 2158
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1183 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 versus 127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Haswell GT2 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Quick Sync |