AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 874 MHz
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 351
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 163
- 8.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 1367
- 10.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 3.15
- 12.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 84.603
- 10.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 0.294
- 13.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 10.608
- 8.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 513
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 940 vs 677
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2158 vs 1187
- 8.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 513
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 940 vs 677
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2158 vs 1187
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 27 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 874 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 1367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 3.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 84.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 0.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 10.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 vs 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 vs 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 vs 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 vs 1187 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- 139.8x better floating-point performance: 167.8 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 1367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 3.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 84.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 0.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 10.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 1187 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | GF119 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 27 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 876 | 1591 |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 874 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 167.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 6.992 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 13.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||