AMD Radeon RX 550 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 874 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 6.992 GTexel / s
- 10.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 48
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 4.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- 7.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 351
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 163
- 8.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 1367
- 10.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 3.15
- 12.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 84.603
- 10.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 0.294
- 13.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 10.608
- 8.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 513
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 940 versus 677
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2158 versus 1187
- 8.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 513
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 940 versus 677
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2158 versus 1187
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 27 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 874 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 6.992 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 48 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 1367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 3.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 84.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 0.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 10.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 versus 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 versus 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 versus 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 versus 1187 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- 139.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 167.8 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 50 Watt
| Performance á point flottant | 167.8 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 1367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 3.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 84.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 0.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 10.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 1187 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Lexa | GF119 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 27 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1591 |
| Prix maintenant | $75 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 874 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 167.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 6.992 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 292 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 13.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||