AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 1400x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2735 vs 2525
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 486 vs 411
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11663 vs 7973
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 23.168
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 592.345
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.141
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 28.29
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 47.404
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 3948
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 3948
• Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1199 vs 881

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 1187.5x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 940
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2158
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 940
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2735 2525
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	486 411
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11663 7973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1199 881

Compare specifications (specs)