AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.9x more boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 31.6x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- 128x more pipelines: 512 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 128x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 32 MB
- 11.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 182.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 vs 15
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 204
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 February 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 32 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 vs 15 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 204 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 | 15 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 204 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11662 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1200 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
| Code name | Lexa | NV44 A2 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 February 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 870 | 867 |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 16 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 4.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 300 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 64 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 550 with others
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
