AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon R9 M380

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon R9 M380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 546.907
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.618
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 48.878
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 3688
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 940 vs 536
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 3688
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 940 vs 536

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 1280x better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 2735
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 486
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12660 vs 11663
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 33.507
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 140.911
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2855 vs 2158
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2855 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2735 2774
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	486 530
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11663 12660
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 34.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 546.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 2.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 48.878
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 194.051
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 2855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 2855

Compare specifications (specs)