AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 162.36 GT/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8803 vs 3368
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 708
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 4620
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 4620
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 29 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 vs 3368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 vs 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 vs 4620 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3717
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3351
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3717
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD Radeon E8870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 | 3368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 708 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 18191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 18191 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 2.0 |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 29 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 257 | 341 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Code name | Saturn | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500 with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 485M
AMDRadeon RX 5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
AMDRadeon RX 5500 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
AMDRadeon RX 5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
AMDRadeon RX 5500 vs
IntelArc Pro A50
AMDRadeon RX 5500 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
