AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200-1275 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3642.9x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.1x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19039 vs 7525
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 22.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19039 vs 7525 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- 275.7x better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19039 | 7525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Oland |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | $89 |
Place in performance rating | 1110 | 1087 |
Price now | $104.99 | $78.34 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 50.84 | 27.62 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 716.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
VGA | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
DDMA audio |