AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD FirePro W5100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 1828x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 vs 2978
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 11724
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 35.15
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 3.199
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 57.354
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 163.258
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 4397
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 4397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 31 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 vs 2978 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 vs 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 vs 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 vs 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 vs 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 vs 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 vs 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 vs 4397 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100
- 549.2x better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 486
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 775.281
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 vs 486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 vs 775.281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 | 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Bonaire |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 31 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 513 | 627 |
Price now | $104.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz | 930 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 1,428 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 171 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |