AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200-1275 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 1619x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 vs 3140
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 16200
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 38.068
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 3.386
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 58.285
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 188.858
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 4799
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 4799
• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 vs 1402

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

• 620.4x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 486
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 775.281
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3688
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3140
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	486 515
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57671 16200
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.81 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	775.281 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.602 3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.428 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	257.062 188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 1402

Compare specifications (specs)