AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 700 MHz
• 29142.9x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.9x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1048 MB
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 vs 426
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 486 vs 189
• 49.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 1161
• 18.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 3.121
• 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 vs 109.787
• 12.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 5.005
• 30.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 8.55
• 10x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 660
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1158
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1626
• 10x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 660
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1158
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1626

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM

• 51.7x better floating-point performance: 134.4 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60-80 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 426
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	486 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57671 1161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.81 3.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	775.281 109.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.428 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	257.062 8.55
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 660
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 1626
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 660
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 1626

Compare specifications (specs)