AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• 1272.5x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13490 vs 9848
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 871 vs 423
• Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64726 vs 39513
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 2293.496
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 12.704
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 139.717
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 692.9

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1130 MHz
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 207.909
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 13621
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3358
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 13621
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3358
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 1669

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13490 9848
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	871 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64726 39513
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	207.909 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3560.776 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.486 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.938 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1111.648 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13621 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13621 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 8048
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1669 4887

Compare specifications (specs)