AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 878x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64726 vs 55424
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 182.11
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 1797.792
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 14.071
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 26.444
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 1035.984
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3638
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1669 vs 1471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 vs 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 vs 1471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 13490
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 871
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13621
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13621
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 13490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 13621 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | GP104 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 250 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |