AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 64726 versus 55424
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 versus 182.11
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 versus 1797.792
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 versus 14.071
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 versus 26.444
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 versus 1035.984
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3638
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3638
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1669 versus 1471
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 2 November 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 versus 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 versus 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 versus 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 versus 1471 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 6% de pipelines plus haut: 2432 versus 2304
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- 5.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 versus 13490
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 versus 871
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 13621
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 13621
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 versus 13490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 versus 871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 13621 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 | 1471 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 210 | 250 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |