AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 633.7x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 205.837
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 2406.499
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 19.591
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 25.833
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 1002.573
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 10 March 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 vs 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 vs 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 83% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 6 GB
- 7.3x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18567 vs 13611
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 875
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67474 vs 64798
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 13621
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 13621
- Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9874 vs 7702
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18567 vs 13611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 875 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67474 vs 64798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 13621 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 vs 7702 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13611 | 18567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64798 | 67474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 | 9874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | GP102 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 205 | 207 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |