AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1265 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 638.8x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 81% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55515 vs 40088
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3715
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3354
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3715
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 5 March 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 vs 40088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11896 vs 8817
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 731 vs 487
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 11117
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11896 vs 8817 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 731 vs 487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8817 | 11896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | 40088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1318 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | GM200 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 5 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 239 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,000 million |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |