AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 712.3x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3638
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3344
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3638
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55534 vs 55424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14691 vs 8827
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 486
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 11117
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 11117
- Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1471 vs 1320
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14691 vs 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 11117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 vs 1320 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 14691 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55534 | 55424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1320 | 1471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 242 | 245 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |